E-mail: Password:
                    Register For Free Newsletter | Forgot Password?
Latest News
FIA racing ahead with biofuels solution

GEM fuel, a blend of petrol, bioethanol and biomethanol is to be used during the FIA Junior...
Read more >>

Biorefining project in Europe receives large funding

The European Commission has approved millions of Euros in aid for a biorefinery research...
Read more >>

New agreement will aid biofuels growth in Aruba

Renewable energy company Methes Energies has announced its Canadian subsidiary has signed a...
Read more >>

EPA approves QAP-A RIN replacement programme

As part of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)new rules for RIN integrity,...
Read more >>


Subscribe to our RSS news feed


Visitor Poll

Do you agree with new policy that reduces taxes for US producers of renewable chemicals?








Upcoming Events
Biofuels International Conference 2013
11 September 2013 - 12 September 2013
Ramada Plaza, Antwerp, Belgium
Read more >>
World Biofuels 2013
23 May 2013 - 24 May 2013
Seville, Spain
ILTA
3 June 2013 - 5 June 2013
Houston, Texas
21st European Biomass Conference and Exhibition
3 June 2013 - 7 June 2013
Copenhagen, Denmark

 

 
Volume 5, Issue 1

Feature: Fair comparison?
A new report on the carbon intensity of crude oil in Europe highlights dramatic disparities in lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of crudes produced from different oilfields, and points to significant reductions that could be achieved by infrastructure improvements, technology upgrades, and other measures. By far the largest sources of upstream emissions are natural gas flaring and tar sands extraction. The report, released by the International Council on Clean Transportation, provides detailed estimates of the carbon intensity of crude oil down to the level of individual fields and identifies the data needed to make those calculations. It appears as the European Commission nears a decision on the methodology for calculating lifecycle GHG intensity of fossil fuels, as part of the implementation of Article 7a of the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). Globally, extracting, transporting, and refining crude oil on average accounts for about 18% of well-to-wheels GHG emissions—that is, the total emissions produced from oilfield to burning fuel to move a car. That equates to roughly five times the CO2 emissions of Germany. But these emissions vary significantly with source and type of crude and production methods. For the highest intensity crudes, extraction-to-refining constitutes around 40% of the overall carbon footprint, about 50g CO2/MJ. This compares to only about 5%, or 4g CO2/MJ, for the lowest intensity crudes. ‘The magnitude of the difference between the most and least polluting operations is enormous—a factor of 10,’ says Drew Kodjak, executive director of the ICCT. ‘The European Commission has an opportunity now to require that companies report the data necessary for those calculations.’


Latest Issue
Latest Issue

Volume 7, Issue 3

View full issue contents >>

Go to shopping pages >>

 

 

Homepage | About Us | Magazine Store | Industry News | Global Events | Industry Jobs | Forum | Advertising | Contact | Register Free | Forgot Password?
Published by Horseshoe Media Ltd, Marshall House, 124 Middleton Road, Morden, Surrey. SM4 6RW
Registered in England No. 5635474. VAT GB 867 9796 31
Website Maintained by Fishbowl IT! All content and images copyright 2008 Horse Shoe Media Limited.